OSHWA and Altium Live: Done.

Well it’s been a crazy few weeks since my last Upverter and CircuitMaker blog post. There’s a lot going on with the Open Source Hardware Summit at MIT in Boston, and then the very next week I had the privilege of presenting once again at the AltiumLive Summit in San Diego. As a result I’ve been kept from updating the community but… here we are!

OSH – Summit 2018

OSHWA summit was extraordinary as ever. Sponsored by several companies in the open source hardware / hacker / maker community, Octopart, Upverter and CircuitMaker brands were represented. Why do we even care about this event? Because the Open Hardware Summit and the CircuitMaker and Upverter communities share the same spirit – information wants to be free, and we can’t build and improve our electronics unless the work of those who went before us is available to build upon. For this reason, and for the social aspect, I’ve always loved attending these events – to find out what’s new in the community, promote CircuitMaker and Upverter designs, meet old friends, and discuss cool projects people are working on.

There were a lot of excellent talks about the state of OSHW and it’s future, exciting innovations that can only occur because open source collaborators band together to achieve amazing things out of sheer enthusiasm, and improvements at the community level with a new version of the open source hardware certification program.

Up-close view of the OSHWA 2018 badge.
Up-close view of the OSHWA 2018 badge.
Registration Table at OSHWA 2018 – Drew Fustini was rapidly programming everyone’s name into their badge.

Drew Fustini of OSH Park posted video recordings of the main presentations which you can catch up on over at the OSH Park blog: http://blog.oshpark.com/2018/10/07/open-hardware-summit-live-stream/

New Open Hardware Certification V2.0

So what does the new OSHWA certification process mean? It comes down to the Community Definition of what Open Source Hardware actually is. Let me explain it in my words – I’m sure you’ll relate to this story:

I got excited when I discovered “open source” single board computers were made cheaply available to makers. The first of these $30-ish single board computers most people think of in this sense is the Raspberry Pi. It’s a great tool, and the fact that it runs a useful Linux distro with Python makes it especially so. With this information, there are many websites and marketing material out there since it’s release talking about open source development and waving the “open source” flag, but the day I tried finding the schematic and PCB files so I could learn (not even copy, but learn, mind) about the PCB design of the Raspberry Pi, was they day I learned that not all the people out there marketing a product as open source are telling the whole truth. I was angered by this, as I’m sure some of you may have been as well. I’m not knocking the Raspberry Pi designers or even Broadcom for the product – we all agree it’s great – but there is an incongruence to all this which I personally find distasteful. I’m all for commercial, closed and open designs for different things, but if you call something open in your marketing, you should make it truly open.

What I love about the new Open Hardware Certification is that you can’t just slap the official logo on your design unless it does meet the true community definition of open hardware. And what that boils down to is a short list of important characteristics, my personal favorites of which are:

  • Original CAD format files are made available.
    • This has to be the most important criteria. Just putting the schematics in to a PDF or even making gerber files available for download is considered not acceptable to the community definition (I’m looking at YOU, PI clones!)
  • No restrictions on Use:
    • For an open source design to be certified, its use cannot be restricted to any people group, country, industry or business. It’s truly available and useful to all.
  • Software to operate hardware:
    • Any software needed to make the hardware carry out its function either:
      • Has to be also available under a similar open source license, or,
      • Documented enough that suitable software/firmware can be written by anyone with the skills to do it.
  • Does not restrict external hardware or software:
    • Including the requirement that external software working with it be open source. In other words, you don’t have to use KiCAD to draw your schematics, just because you want the design to be open. You can use any CAD tool you prefer.
    • This also means you can write your own custom software or firmware, or design other non-open source hardware, that interoperates WITH this open hardware product. This is an important requirement for open hardware to be able to form a legitimate play in the electronics economy. Without this, we’d not have such a great competitive environment for 3D printers, laser cutters, single board computers, and many consumer devices.

But I cannot do justice to the certification program here. I highly recommend you read about it and follow it through for your own projects as Michael Weinberg, OSHWA President, suggested in his talk at the 2018 Summit. It costs you nothing but a little extra time and attention to details, and it’s definitely worth it.

To learn more, check out the OSHWA Certification Page: https://certification.oshwa.org/

More Summit Highlights

I did get to sneak in a couple of video interviews. So stay tuned for more. This first one was with Jasmine Brackett from Tindie – a maker oriented marketplace where any of us can sell hardware products we designed in Upverter or CircuitMaker!

Altium Live 2018

Old School Altium Live badges - no paperwhites or microcontrollers here!

…Then on to AltiumLive! Me, Camaryn and Christian building camaraderie by attaching lanyards to “old school” badges. Perhaps we can learn from the OSHWA crowd and get on the electronic badge bandwagon for AltiumLive next year – it would sure make prepping the badges more fun!!

Upverter Meetup Oakland – User Interviews

Hi everyone!

CM version of this blog was already posted here: https://circuitmaker.com/blog/oakland-meetup-user-interviews-oshwa-summit

It’s great to see so many new projects all the time. With almost no input from Altium to this Upverter community it speaks volumes to see the momentum here. This is in spite of some people that would cast doubt over the future of this product.

We announced earlier that CircuitMaker is going to be renamed “Upverter Desktop”. We are working to merge the communities and data together – so Altium R&D and Upverter R&D teams have become a single unit collaborating across Kiev, La Jolla, and Toronto offices. These fine factories are feverishly coding to ensure data and user accounts can be brought together without loss of fidelity. As technical folks, you’re no doubt aware this is not trivial. Naturally it will take a bit of time, but so far our R&D team tells me it’s pressing forward, and later this year or early next we’ll have our sites merged and hope to have some beta testing going on well before that.

Meanwhile Upverter is here en force, and we want to keep the ball rolling on all the cool designs and community content being produced. So keep up the great work. There’s more info coming soon, but I’ll give you a tip – we’re rolling out a user generated content incentive program this month. I’ll blog separately about that soon.

In other news, we just had our Oakland meetup event, graciously hosted by Circuit Launch by Oakland airport. These guys have a really big nice workspace for startups to come in and get some serious robotics and 3D printing done, among other things. While we were there I was privileged to get some neat interviews with a few people, working on interesting projects. Check these out below…

https://youtu.be/3kc2MztsxFk

Karlis Veilands shares his build of BlueSaab 6.1 – designed in CircuitMaker by Seth Evans – and explains the movement of “Saab addicts” who needed a solution for integrating Bluetooth audio connectivity into their 1990s-2000s Saab 93 and 95 models, replacing the old factory CD changer with this module to provide all modern conveniences of phone connectivity in the high-end audio system of these luxury vehicles. There are now quite a few BlueSaab users and a vibrant forum and community support the product. It’s for communities of collaborators like this that we wanted to make sure the open source community had access not just to PCB tools, but the most productive.

https://youtu.be/LdzsFXcNKYE

Alex Wayne is a software developer by day, and an LED kinetic sculpture artist by night. What do you need when your normal line of work is not doing hardware, but you need to do hardware efficiently for your side projects? You turn the the most productive tools with the simplest user interface that’s what! And in Alex’s case, he switched from EAGLE and KiCAD in his earlier attempts to Upverter. Now he’s designing boards for some pretty amazing APA102 LED based kinetic art sculpture work – commissioned by the city of Santa Rosa CA. See his  interview to discover more about this interesting project.

Our next meetup isn’t actually ours!! Our next meetup will be the Open Source Hardware Summit – this Thursday at MIT in Boston. We’ll be emailing the CircuitMaker and Upverter Bostonians in a day or two with more details. We would certainly love to see you there! But even if you can’t get the day off for Thursday, perhaps we could catch up Wednesday evening at a pub in Cambridge? Either way, I hope to see you there or at our next meetup which will be in the Los Angeles CA area. Keep designing cool stuff and I’ll report back here again soon!

 

About the Sausage Factory Project

My First “UPVERTED” Design

In my earlier post about taking the plunge and forcing myself to learn how to use Upverter, I mentioned the project I was working on was a new guitar overdrive / distortion pedal I named “Sausage Factory”.

Well, some friends got back to me and requested to see what was in it – just out of curiosity, so although my original intention was to keep this a private project, I figured it would do no harm to share and describe more about it.

Every design should begin with a design specification. Mine was very simple:

  • Marshall style high-gain front-end.
  • Fender/Vox/Marshall passive tone stack (Bass, Mid, Treble)
  • 7-band Graphic Equalizer similar to the Mesa/Boogie Mark IIC
  • Individual footswitching for the OD section and Graphic
  • Fit in a single hammond 1590BB metal box
  • As low noise as possible.

I used an opamp based graphic. I knew I could probably do all this in DSP based on Eli Hughes’ Monkey Jam, but since I’m learning Upverter at the same time I figured this design would stay in the analog realm so I could have more going on with the PCB. This will be harder and take longer to assemble my prototypes by a long way, since there’s a lot of 0603 parts in a graphic EQ!

This one was done first as a module in Upverter so that I could place this graphic EQ into any future designs very easily. I like the the physical design reuse aspects of Upverter – this is not just a device sheet or sheet symbol but a full hierarchical reuse block which includes the pre-routed PCB layout for it.

I’m specifying LM4562MAX/NOPB parts in this project because they are the best low-noise opamps right now which are affordable and useful at lower gains (such as in the EQ section where the gain may be 0dB or up to +/-12dB)

GraphicEQ_Schematichttps://upverter.com/eda/embed/#designId=1bbbd2511f352cc9,actionId=

The opamp gyrators were set to have Q factors and frequency bands similar to the MESA/Boogie Mark II head’s graphic, but there’s no way to get it exactly the same because it’s not the same circuit. The target center frequencies are 84Hz, 240Hz, 400Hz, 1KHz, 2KHz, 4KHz and 8KHz. The Boogie was designed a long time ago, before opamps were cheap enough or low noise enough to be used as gyrators, so that circuit uses tank circuits with real inductors and caps and resistors in series. There’s no end to the audible nuance in such things, but for my intents this is enough to make great tone, and finding the right inductors to use to faithfully copy the Boogie EQ circuit would render this project prohibitively expensive.

I created a new project after the GEQ7 re-usable module for the main overdrive pedal. This is the Sausage Factory – I named it this because it’s meant to be a meat-grinding face-melting distortion capable unit.

SausageFactoryPCBhttps://upverter.com/eda/embed/#designId=59034a1ef51ae755,actionId=

As with the EQ modules, I’ve used LM4562MAX/NOPB opamps throughout. I’ve used those before in other high-gain designs like the “Screamin’ Dolly” and they sound amazing, yet have extremely low noise. The Screamin’ Dolly next to a TS-808 will give the same tone but way less hiss because of these opamps. Similar to the TS-808 and TS-9 in this design I’m using an input buffer with a 2N5088 transistor configured as an emitter follower.

You can see the gain stage is followed by a higher voltage clipping circuit as used in Marshall Preamps, where they used a diode rectifier bridge, shorted with an additional rectifier (Silicon) diode between them. This provides a clipping voltage of about 1.5-2V as opposed to many overdrives using a single pair of back-to-back signal diodes which will clip hard at about 0.6V. The circuit here is better for a more natural head-like overdrive, and for driving the following passive tone stage. After the tone stack is a buffer with a small amount of additional voltage gain (6dB), a Master volume control pot, and then into the EQ.

Both sections – the preamp/overdrive and the graphic EQ, have pin-headers for ribbon cables to go off the board and be soldered to the 3-pole double-throw try bypass footswitches. I have a big bag of these footswitches from China ready to go…

I keep hearing about more and more PCB prototyping fab services, one of which is PCBWay. They seemed to be fairly low cost and promised a very fast turnaround time, so I went ahead and ordered the bare boards to be made there. I had them back in 2.5 weeks which was pretty fast for an off shore fab.

The quality seems good, though my silkscreen coudn’t easily be edited to show all the graphic EQ reference designators properly – so I’m just going to have to use Upverter interactively while I put these prototypes together, as a “living” assembly drawing.

20180726_153156

The boards were vacuum packed well, and I ordered their minimum prototype run of 5. I also ordered the stainless steel solder paste stencil – I’ll do another post and video when I use it to show how to use a stencil and desktop reflow oven for soldering the parts onto the boards.

20180726_153435

So, this is an honest quirk of Upverter when you use re-usable modules like I did for this EQ section – it prefixes each module reference designator with the hierarchical parent designator of the module instance. So all these reference designators begin with GQ: that’s not a bad way to handle this hierarchy. However I was not able to move the silkscreen texts in the main board, so many of them ended up cropped by the solder mask openings…

Oh well, one more thing we will improve with Upverter I guess!

Stay tuned for more posts when I put these together and do some testing.

CircuitMaker and Upverter Meet at OSH Park Headquarters

Originally posted on the CircuitMaker Blog, August 3rd 2018.

Just a quick update – we had our latest “Upverter and CircuitMaker Tour” meetup on August 2nd at OSH Park Headquarters in Portland OR. Special thanks to Laen and the OSH Park crew for hosting us! It was really great to meet a bunch (about 22) of CircuitMaker and Upverter users there and hear from you all first hand where you need this to go.

In between discussing Perfect Purple PCBs and projects as diverse as custom guitar pickups and multi-Gigahertz RF boards, Zak and I were able to get candid and direct feedback about where Altium’s going with this whole Upverter + CircuitMaker merge thing.

Upshots:

  • Module based design is where this needs to go if hobbyists, artists, scientists and others are going to be able to do hardware design.
  • Modular design has a whole host of big boulders to lift, like power supplies, voltage signal levels compatibility, serial and bus interfaces, routing, PCB layer stack compatibility and so on.
  • NRE costs are a big barrier. Today, the reason shared panel services like OSH Park are so popular is that they can spread the panel cost among many designers. This will continue, and we need to work with manufacturers to bring this concept to full assembly without exploding the costs to the end user who just wants to get their project working.
  • Routing automation needs to be better out of the box, so it “just works” for non-PCB designers.

Needless to say, there’s a lot we need to do to make our future vision a reality. But nothing great ever happened without aiming high!

What do you think? What issues do you believe will be the “big boulders” for us to move if we’re going to make this work for anyone who wants to try turning their idea into a real electronic device?

Please comment!

Upverter Tour Update – Vancouver Hack Space

Our next stop on the tour was Vancouver!  First I want to thank VHS (Vancouver Hack Space) for hosting our 4th meetup, the space is great and the people are even better, if you are ever in town you should swing by and check it out. I think Tuesday is open house night.

For this one I was flying solo with the goals to connect with our users, get feedback on the future of Upverter and Circuit Maker, and find the words that best describe what we are working on.  I hope everyone had as good a time, I could not have had a better and more engaging time talking about what people are working on and Upverter’s future plans.

So what did we talk about? well we started with what people are working on, like this pump controller for a sail boat! And being a fire thrower on weekends!  As a side note, I love boats and electronics, so I was jealous.  The people that came and the projects that they are making made this event a great time.  Thank you everyone for coming out and sharing.

1020393
1020396

I got to talk with people about what Upverter is are working on right now, how our engineering team is busy working night and day bringing Upverter and Circuit Maker communities together.  It was exciting to talk to people that had used both, what drew them to try both and how they see bringing our families together to make a better place to build electronics.  I am excited to keep this ball rolling and get the new look Upverter + Circuit Maker joint community live by the end of the year!

Together we we also talked about the future, what we are thinking and discuss what we are cooking up in the lab.  I got the chance to get feedback on the Upverter all in one solution that helps take Ideas and deliver them to your door.  What does that mean?  Well this is were it go tricky, I will need more ink to fully explain, but let me give you an idea of the high level what we talked about.
1020398

The first idea we talked about is “automated system design to pcb”, “modular design” or “drag and drop electronics”.  This is making a tool that connects templates together at a functional level, not at the IC level, making it easier and faster to get from your idea to a manufacturable PCB layout.  One aspect that I am excited about it having a fully syncronized System design, schematic and PCB layout!

The next idea that we talked about is integrated manufacturing, having a “print button” that checked the design for errors ahead of ordering, and when it passes, have a fully assembled PCB at your door.  This solves a real problem that I have personally, I cannot wait to make this a reality!

Finally we talked about integrated enclosure design.  Is it be better to auto-generate an enclosure from the PCB design? or should we make the enclosure and generate a board outline from the created enclosure?  both?  we need to start somewhere and we need your help on building what makes sense for you

 

We are doing the next meetups in the Bay Area, if you are around you need to join us!  I would love to get your thoughts on what future and get to know what kinds of projects you are working on, thinking about or dreaming of making.  Check out when and where we are going next on the Upverter Events Page.

Michael and the Upverter Team!

Perspective

Hi Everyone, Ben Jordan here.

Remember me? I did a whole raft of videos about Altium Designer “design secrets”, ran tech support for a while, and then was the whole business owner for “CircuitMaker” for it’s first two years of life.

I’ve been playing around in Upverter for a few months now, because we (Altium) acquired Upverter and I was asked to work with these guys.

At first, I had some apprehension. I’m shooting you straight here. It came from about 2 years ago when I did some competitive analysis between Upverter and CircuitMaker for the live collaboration capabilities. At that time, Upverter felt so restrictive to me because from the ground up the user interface is designed to have one (and only one) way to perform each task in the design process, whereas Altium software (Altium Designer, CircuitMaker etc.) typically offer a much more featured and flexible approach. That’s not always better, by the way – it depends who you are and what you want to acheive.

So, taking a deep breath, I forced myself to go through a complete project from front to back, to make myself learn how to use Upverter and to see what the philosophy really was behind it from inception.

And you know what?

I’m a believer.

I don’t say this lightly.

Upverter as a startup since 2011 put all their effort into doing things differently than the “old EDA” guard. The user experience philosophy was strongly typed to not just make a schematic and PCB tool in the cloud, but to make it do the bidding of designers in the simplest way possible. And initially, I’m not gonna lie, to someone who spent literally years learning a “mainstream” power tool for board level electronics design (ie. me) Upverter at first seemed overly simple. But scratching the surface by forcing myself to use Upverter for a *real project* has totally given me a new perspective.

Upverter_Board

This tool is efficient because it’s elegent. Elegence in software and UX design is actually extremely hard to do. The more progress you make on a product design – hardware or software – the more ideas enter into the mix, and the more tempting it is to add those features. This is called feature creep in traditional software circles, but more commonly referred to as “bloat” these days.

At first, working with Upverter felt a little too tight and restrictive for me, but it wasn’t long before I realized that the design was getting done faster than I had expected, and it was because of a few things that would be easy to take for granted if you’d been using Upverter for a while:

  • Obvious control menu structure.
  • Selection Filters.
  • Automatic synchronization.
  • Every numerical field is a calculator.

There are quite a few others too – but I’m still learning Upverter and these were the first few UI/UX items that stood out as productivity gains to me. My favorite is perhaps the last one – that in any object properties dialogue you can type a mathematical formula into the field and Upverter will just calculate the result for you. This saves so much time especially when creating footprints for new components. It’s a thing you’d expect any tool to have, and I can say that Altium Designer users have been asking for this for many years and still don’t have it. (They have other cool stuff BTW, but still…)

UPV_Calculator

That may seem like a small thing. It’s HUGE. This alone saved me LOTs of time doing the design you see above (my next Guitar Pedal Design – I’m calling it the “Sausage Factory” – stay tuned for a video demoing the prototype!!)

There’s a lot more to say, but a blog shouldn’t be too long – but as I learned a long time ago, the best way to learn something is to have to teach it to someone else. So to that end, look forward to future blogs and videos from me about how to actually do cool designs and use these productivity accelerators in Upverter.

My hat’s off to Zak, Mike and Steve for doing the hard work of being a startup, and taking on the hard problems of hardware. I’m personally excited that together we can make hardware less hard – even more, make it so you can take your ideas and turn them into working devices, regardless of who you are. Whether you’re a student, hobbyist, hacker, or professional engineer it does not matter. Together we’re making Upverter into the platform that will make it easy to get to a working “thing”.

Make a PCB Online From Start to Finish

Using the right online PCB design software gives you flexibility and lets you collaborate with other designers.

Whether you’re a hardware or software person, you’re probably ingrained with that entrepreneurial spirit. You’ve got the vision and the knowledge you need to turn your electronics dreams into reality, but you’ve still got one more obstacle to overcome: you need to build it.

Sometimes budgets don’t measure up to the overall vision of your device. Unless they have the cash to spare, entrepreneurs have to operate on shoestring budgets and need to find the most cost-effective ways to reach their goals. Since the circuit board forms the central nervous system of your electronic device, you’ll need access to PCB design software that can meet your device requirements without breaking the bank.

That’s why online PCB design software might be the best choice to start designing your device. So what is the best way to get started? How do you get from a design on paper to creating deliverables for a manufacturer? The road from concept to product can be made smooth with a great online PCB design software platform.

Which Platform is Right for Me?

If you start searching for an online design platform, you might be unsure which platform is the best for you. So how do you pick the right platform? First things first, avoid the freemium sites. No one wants to spend hours designing their device, only to be told that they need to pay in order to keep their schematic.

When you find a platform, you should make sure it takes you all the way to generating your manufacturer deliverables. An online design platform should actually be a complete platform that includes schematic, circuit board layout, and bill of materials features. The platform should also be integrated with a thorough components library.

Just because an online platform is free doesn’t mean that it can’t contain advanced design features. The most powerful online design software should include rules checking and design constraint features. This will ensure that your designs will meet basic quality standards. Other features like a 3D viewer are extremely useful.

One great way to break into PCB design and bring a new device online quickly is to use a development board. These boards are very versatile and contain many features that can help expedite your design process. The documentation on these boards is very thorough, and tutorials for using these boards can be found online. These boards also mount easily to PCBs and make it easy to interface with other components.

Schematic and Layout

Whether you’re designing online or you’ve spent a bunch of money on a software package, you’ll start designing your product by drawing up a schematic. Your schematic will contain all the electronic components and display your connections between components. You can also write some important notes for yourself in the schematic. Think of it as a blueprint but without all the measurements.

At first glance, it may seem unnecessary to build a schematic of your design. Why not just jump straight into a PCB layout? Why should I have to build the device twice? Once you complete your layout, it may not be obvious how components are connected. This is where schematics are invaluable: they give you a broad view of your device. It is easy to see how components connect to each other, while these connections can be less obvious on a finished PCB layout.

Once you finish your schematic, your layout should be automatically captured and generated based on your schematic. The generated layout will include all the components in your schematic and will have pre-mapped connections between components. You’ll still need to route between components, place copper pours for power and ground, and arrange components to your liking.

When you view your layout for the first time, you may find that it is not how you imagined. Components might appear in odd places, and connections between components might not appear as you imagined. The layout might not initially meet your form factor requirements, and the schematic gives you the opportunity to rearrange your components to fit your packaging.

Once you are inside the layout, you might find that it becomes useful to use more advanced design and routing techniques to save space in your design. Placing traces in multiple layers is important in PCBs with a large number of components but strict form factor requirements. An online platform should include via placement capabilities so that you can route between multiple layers.

Enforcing Design Rules

PCB design is one of those fields where it is easy to start building simple devices. When you are not worried about high speed, high frequency, low power, high current, high temperature, RF communication, or mixed-signal capabilities, most designs you create will likely operate just fine. Designing in consideration of these other requirements is difficult to master and requires adhering to a specific design rule or many.

If you have not designed devices in any of the above areas in the past, you may not have all the relevant design rules memorized. That’s why your online design platform should have the capability to enforce standard design rules for different applications. Not all design rules are set in stone, meaning that certain design rules are meant to operate as constraints. Certain constraints on feature sizes and clearance need to be met in certain applications.

Certain features, especially those appearing in multilayer boards, should also be customizable in an online design platform. Trace sizes, pads, via dimensions, and copper pour areas should all be customizable. This is especially important if you work with certain parts like development boards, as the footprint of these devices cannot be changed. You will need to design your routing and copper pour features to accommodate development if you decide to use them.

Automated PCB manufacturing

Manufacturing Deliverables

It should go without saying that you should always build and test a functional prototype of your device before you start ordering fabricated prototypes. Ordering a large-run is only a good idea if you have tested your functional prototype and your fabricated prototypes, followed by completing any required redesigns. All prototypes should be thoroughly tested before moving to full production, and this will give you an opportunity to fix any problems in your design if needed.

Once you finish your design, checked that it meets standard design rules, and decided you are ready to fabricate a prototype, it’s time to prepare deliverables for your manufacturer. Your design platform will need to generate certain documents based on your board layout. A great online design platform should quickly generate your manufacturer outputs. These documents include a bill of materials, Gerber files and Excellon files, and CAD/CAM files of your device.

All of these files will tell your manufacturer the information they need to plan out the fabrication and assembly process. The bill of materials is important as it contains sourcing and pricing information for components that appear on the board. It should also contain acceptable substitutes for your components in case there is a problem with sourcing. Always check with your manufacturer and get a list of required deliverables.

Collaboration

If you are putting together a team of designers or you are working in a remote organization, an online PCB design platform is perfect for team collaboration. A great online platform gives the design owner the power to add collaborators and document design changes. You should be able to switch between versions easily and download different versions of finished layouts.

Collaboration is extremely smooth and easy in an online PCB design platform. This type of collaboration is excellent for new designers as it gives multiple people an instant view into a project. When more people are collaborating, there is a better chance that design problems can be caught before a board goes to production.

You don’t need to be a large company with a massive budget to jump into PCB or electronics design. Now you can have access to the tools you need to build your dream device with browser-based design software. IoT 360 helps you achieve your design goals with built-in a ton of built-in components and an intuitive user interface. IoT 360 gives you the power to design professional-level devices while helping you stay within your budget.

Sign-up for our service and contact us for more information if you want to learn more about the capabilities of browser-based design and product development.